Taylormade Tour Response vs Srixon Q-Star Tour: Review 2022

TaylorMade customer research revealed that many golfers use expensive premium balls that aren’t suited to their true playing abilities, therefore the company intended to entice players to look beyond market-leading tour balls.

As a result, the TaylorMade Tour Response was born. Srixon’s Q-Star Tour ball, which is the softest ball that delivers tour-level performance, is likewise aimed at the same golf demographic. In this review, we are going to compare the TaylorMade Tour Response vs Srixon Q-Star Tour to determine which of these mid-range balls offers the most value for money.

Taylormade Tour Response vs Srixon Q-Star Tour: Overview

Taylormade Tour Response is made with a premium urethane cover that provides high quality golf at a significantly reduced price. An ultra-low compression core provides a softer feel while optimizing energy transmission and rebound after impact, resulting in increased distance. The 3-piece Tour Response ball is designed to generate high ball speeds by utilizing technology similar to the hottest Tour ball in golf (TP5/TP5x).

The Srixon Q-Star Tour is a premium, lower-compression golf ball with a urethane cover intended specifically for golfers with moderate swing speeds who seek tour-level performance and feel. Srixon’s Compression is easier, and driver spin is decreased, resulting in exceptional distance and accuracy on full strokes. The low drag design increases flight performance for longer distances and greater control. It provides a soft feel with improved greenside spin control.

Comparison Table of Taylormade Tour Response vs Srixon Q-Star Tour

SpecificationsTaylormade Tour ResponseSrixon Q-Star Tour
1. LookThe TaylorMade Tour Response appears to be a high-end premium ball.Srixon’s Q-Star Tour ball has the same look and feel as their top-tier Z-STAR ball, but it features a black number instead of a red number.
2. FeelingThe TaylorMade Tour Response felt firmer than the Srixon Q-Star Tour, particularly off the putter face and wedges, as well as on finesse strokes around the green.Srixon employs SpinSkin with SeRM, a flexible covering that, according to the company, burrows deep into wedge and iron grooves for higher friction and maximum spin.
3. FlightTaylormade flies straight with less deviation, and less spinThe Q-Star Tour ball flies higher but is slightly less precise in terms of dispersion on the launch monitor.
4. DistanceTaylormade flies high with a consistent heightSrixon q-star tour flies higher but spins more and doesn’t go as long distance as Taylormade tour response.

Detailed Comparison Between Taylormade Tour Response and Srixon Q-Star Tour

  • The TaylorMade Tour Response appears to be a high-end premium ball. It contains 322 dimples that provide a neat, uniform pattern and a soft, tacky sensation in the touch.
  • The Tour Response’s numerals are vivid red, and its branded alignment arrow indicates the ball’s identity while also making it easy to line up drives and putts.
  • Srixon’s Q-Star Tour ball has the same look and feel as their top-tier Z-STAR ball, but it features a black number instead of a red number. The black alignment arrow on the side is a wonderful addition that combines the ball’s name with useful targeting guidance off the tee and on the greens. It has a good sticky feel in the hand as a urethane covered ball.
  • The TaylorMade Tour Response felt firmer than the Srixon Q-Star Tour, particularly off the putter face and wedges, as well as on finesse strokes around the green.
  • Srixon employs SpinSkin with SeRM, a flexible covering that, according to the company, burrows deep into wedge and iron grooves for higher friction and maximum spin. Both balls performed well in short game testing, providing plenty of stop and a predictable reaction on landing. A Srixon golf ball is more enjoyable for chipping and pitching.
  • It feels softer and more sensitive, particularly when it’s not properly centered. The Tour Response reacts effectively to center strikes and solid shots, with enough of spring and vitality, however, mishit shots seemed flat and lifeless. Off the face, the ball felt heavy and dense at times.
  • The Srixon Q-Star Tour performed better around the greens, producing more spin, particularly on short to mid-range low flighted pitches. Both balls performed similarly on higher, softer shots such as lobs and greenside pitches.
  • The TaylorMade Tour Response and Srixon Q-Star Tour have comparable flight and spin profiles. Both balls are pitched as having a mid-high launch and low spin, and this pattern proved effective during on-course and launch monitor testing.
  • You’d expect similar outcomes from two balls with high launch, low spin, and a weaker compression core. I obtained identical flight profiles with mid to long irons, but improved flight stability with the Tour Response.
  • Both balls came to a halt promptly on approach shots into greens, but the Tour Response flies more like the best TaylorMade golf balls, with less spin and a straighter, non-deviating flight.
  • The Q-Star Tour ball flies higher but is slightly less precise in terms of dispersion on the launch monitor.
  • In a round of mid-iron testing, it was difficult to tell the balls apart in terms of distance management. Both were as long as Tour balls and averaged more than 170 yards with a 7-iron in testing – longer than my stock yardage of 169 – recorded on a gapping test with a Pro V1x and a Foresight GC2 launch monitor.
  • It took off high and flew steadily and consistently. The spin rate was a little high, slightly below 3000rpm, but it didn’t stop the ball from getting out there. In a stiff breeze, of course, it sailed with a wonderful rainbow flight and seemed to cut through the wind well.
  • The Srixon Q-Star Tour launched and flew higher, but it felt spinny on the course, and when tested on the launch monitor, the Srixon didn’t fly as far as the Taylormade Tour Response.
  • The Q-Star Tour stretched more with my wedges than the TaylorMade Tour Response, but the TaylorMade ball retained a tighter dispersion and was typically more consistent in peak flight, according to launch monitor tests.
  • The TaylorMade Tour Response ball has the feel of a softer, less expensive version of the brand’s premier TP5 and TP5X balls, with the only drawback being a stiff, dull sensation on off-center strokes. Srixon’s Q-Star Tour performs around the green and holds up well in long game testing, but it didn’t click for me off the tee. Given the price, both balls are the greatest mid-priced golf balls on the market, giving the tour-like performance, a soft feel, and plenty of distance.

TaylorMade Tour Response Golf Ball Reviews

Features

  • Increased groove engagement to provide greater backspin around the green.
  • For a better feel, use a soft flexible material with greater elastic components.
  • Crosslinking is a chemical event that creates an irreversible connection for increased shear resistance.

Pros

  • A dozen costs $34.99
  • Soft tough urethane covered ball
  • Made for unisex adults
  • Each ball weighs 1.45 pounds

Cons

  • More expensive than Srixon Tour Golf balls.

Srixon Q Star Tour Golf Balls Reviews (One Dozen)

Features

  • Improved spin skin
  • Core is made of Energetic Gradient Growth
  • Thinner urethane cover

Pros

  • A dozen costs $32.95
  • It has a thin urethane cover
  • 324 dimples which improve distance and flight.
  • Each golf ball weighs only 1 pound
  • Suggested for men
  • Perfect for the elderly population

Cons

  • Made for only right-hand orientation

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: Should I get a Taylormade tour response or a Srixon q-star tour?

Answer: If you want 3 pieces golf balls that are valued for money, you should go for Taylormade. And if you are looking for a golf ball that is high spinning around the greens, you should buy the Srixon q-star tour.

Question: What’s the compression for Srixon q-star tour?

Answer: Srixon q-star tour golf balls have a compression 72.

Question: What’s the compression for the Taylormade Tour response?

Answer: Taylormade Tour Response has an ultra-low compression of 40.

Question: Which pro players use Srixon q-star tour golf balls?

Answer: Brooks Koepka, Hideki Matsuyama, Shane Lowry, Cameron Champ and many other golfers use Srixon q-star tour golf balls.

Question: Which pro players use Taylormade Tour Response golf balls?

Answer: Tiger Woods, Dustin Johnson, Collin Morikawa, Matthew Wolff, Rickie Fowler and many more pro golfers use Taylormade Tour Response.

Question: Are Srixon q-star Tour suitable for elderly golfers?

Answer: Srixon q-star tour golf balls are perfect for elderly golfers as they are soft and fly an impressive height and spin more on the green.

Question: Who is more suitable for using Taylormade Tour Response?

Answer: Any adult regardless of age and gender can use the Taylormade Tour response.

Question: What handicap player can play with Taylormade Tour Response?

Answer: Golfers using 11-20 golf handicaps have expressed great satisfaction with Taylormade Tour Response.

Question: What handicapped player can play with the Srixon Q-star Tour?

Answer: Srixon Q-star Tour golf balls are ideal for golfers with a golf handicap of 9-16.

Final Thoughts

We have tried to cover every aspect of comparing the two golf balls Taylormade Tour Response vs Srixon Q-Star Tour. In terms of price, both the golf balls are great value for money. And both Taylormade Tour Response and Srixon q-star tour deliver well to suitable golfers. After reading the entire article, we hope to have helped guide you to decide which golf ball is more suitable for you. If you have any other questions, don’t hesitate to reach out to us.

Related Comparison Article: srixon q star vs q star tour

Leave a Comment